Student articles
2026 editionThe Limits of Sporting Autonomy after the Super League Judgement: Has the CJEU redefined UEFA’s regulatory powers?
By
Gabriel Louis Escobar
Executive Course in International Sports Law - 2026 Edition
Published
13 August 2026
This article analyses the limits of sporting autonomy after the CJEU’s Super League judgment, focusing on whether the decision redefined UEFA’s and FIFA’s regulatory powers under EU law. It explains the traditional concept of sporting autonomy through global sports law and lex sportiva, before examining earlier EU law limits established in Bosman and Meca-Medina. The article then assesses the Super League dispute, including UEFA and FIFA’s prior authorisation system, threatened sanctions and control over commercial rights.
Its central conclusion is that the CJEU did not abolish sporting autonomy or the European sports model, but transformed it into a form of supervised autonomy: UEFA and FIFA may remain legitimate regulators of football, but their discretion must now operate within transparent, objective, non-discriminatory and proportionate legal frameworks subject to EU law scrutiny.
Full text · PDF
Academic Article - Gabriel Louis Escobar_Executive Course 2026.pdf
More publications
Student articles
Football Disputes in Turkey: Jurisdiction Between TFF Bodies and Ordinary Courts
Sidar Īlhan
Executive Course in International Football Law - 2026 Edition
Student articles
Underage Football Players in Brazil: Legal Certainty in the Representation of Minors under FIFA and National Regulations
Joao Marcello Costa
Executive Course in International Sports Law - 2026 Edition
Student articles
The Rise and Fall of Third Party Ownership in Football
Pasha Hajian
Executive Course in International Football Law - 2026 Edittion
Have something to publish?
Submit a publication.
archive@orei.institute